Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Hazelmere

Thousands spent on Aylesbury road with no accidents

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
25 February 2010
Around £40,000 is to be spent on a road safety scheme in Aylesbury town centre - despite not a single accident there for at least five years.
Stephen Rotherham, who lives in the old town and works in Aylesbury town centre, is outraged that taxpayers will be made to pick up the bill for a traffic management scheme he claims is not needed.

The work by Bucks County Council follows the introduction of a 20mph speed limit into the old town, along roads such as Castle Street and Rickfords Hill.

Sian Thomas, team leader – traffic management from Bucks County Council, has confirmed that there is no record of any accidents at the spot where the road safety system is already being constructed – just outside Sainsbury's in Buckingham Street – for at least five years.

Mr Rotherham said: "It seems to me that BCC is spending approximately £40,000 on a traffic- calming measure in a place where there haven't been any accidents.

"Is this the tip of the iceberg? How many other ill-conceived schemes are ratepayers' money being wasted on?"

Ms Thomas said in an email to Mr Rotherham: "This scheme has not been promoted as a 'casualty reduction' scheme primarily, however, any reduction to speed would undoubtedly improve safety and lessen the chances of a pedestrian being injured or worse.

"Although there does not seem to be a particularly bad problem with crashes on Buckingham Street, the ethos of a 20mph zone is to educate drivers to the fact that the whole of the zone is now a 20mph speed limit, hopefully discouraging a mind set that is no longer welcome in Aylesbury town centre."

For more on this story, pick up a copy of The Bucks Herald, out now.

Should money be spent on safety improvements? Lets us know your thoughts by clicking the comment button below.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 25 February 2010 11:01 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Aylesbury
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Ordinary Chap,

25/02/2010 13:52:16
I suggest that the County Council save the money spent on these types of "politically correct" schemes and spend it on filling all the potholes that currently litter virtually every road in the county, I'm sure that this would save even more money by reducing the number of claims by motorists for damage to tyres/wheels etc as well as accidents involving cyclists/motor cyclists. The County Council would seem to be spending too much time and effort in dreaming up schemes that no-one, apart from themselves, thinks are necessary. They need to sort out their priorities.
2

Councillors just dont care,

25/02/2010 16:06:04
This woman at BCC should be asked a simple question - if she had to fund it herself from her own money would she consider it necessary and would she pay for it. I expect the answer would be NO, but as it is not her money she seems all too happy to spend it!!
3

JR,

25/02/2010 18:36:11
"Is this the tip of the iceberg? How many other ill-conceived schemes are ratepayers' money being wasted on?"

Overly flamboyant footbridge, Overly decorated entrance to bus station, the never open information centre outside the library, painting cyle lanes everywhere then allowing cars to park all over them, building fountains and rivers and the never working water clock in Kingsbury. The theatre that has already gone waaaaaay over budget, a swimming pool that is less than a decade old (now due a £7million addition - it was only £5million 2 years ago & I doubt it cost £7million to build!). The laying of red tarmac paths across main roads (giving pedestrians the wrong impression) and the multi-million pound council chambers.

OK, so the money for these projects comes from different public pots - but at the end of the day, it is the public pot that is constantly being dipped into, give the numerous pots whatever name you like, they all still have to be filled from OUR pockets via some form of taxation.
Imaginge the jobs that could have been saved had the public pot not been drained by all the above projects.
4

AVDC4DOLE,

26/02/2010 10:23:08
As JR says, the red crossings are a joke. They give the wrong impression to cyclists & pedestrians, and car drivers take no notice at all of them (which they're not obliged too). A particularly fine example is the set by Coldharbour Lane crossing the A418 where it's easily possible to be stood there for 5 minutes waiting to cross. They slap these things in on the "cheap", then don't bother to assess how they're performing, instead of paying to put a toucan crossing in. But then as the contractors are on the "Milk-the-council-for-all-it's-worth-because-it'll-get-signed-off-anyway" bandwagon...
5

Mr Logical,

Aylesbury Vale 26/02/2010 17:34:36
Over the years, the Bucks Herald has accused Buckinghamshire County Council many times of NOT being prepared to spend money on road schemes where there is a perceived risk but where there have been no collisions. How many times have you run stories along the lines of "Does someone have to be killed on this road before you will do anything about it?" Now that they are doing what the Bucks Herald kept telling them it wanted them to do, you've gone and done a U-turn!
6

Kcookie1984,

The willows 01/03/2010 11:35:42
"Around £40,000 is to be spent on a road safety scheme in Aylesbury town centre - despite not a single accident there for at least five years"

HMMMMMMM im sure £40,000 is more than enough to make the so say SHARED SPACE on the new "hub" a hell of a lot safer??? Or maybe some other roads/pathways to be made safer???
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.