Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Steve Hill Motorsport
Sponsored by

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Could Thames Water build giant pool in Aylesbury Vale?



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
14 May 2008
A RESERVOIR could be built on environmentally sensitive land in the Vale, to cope with predicted water shortages in London and the South East.
Despite a 16-week consultation period having been launched by Thames Water on May 7, few people in the area appear to be aware of the proposals.

Over the next 25 years Buckinghamshire and the South East will face water shortages unless drastic action is taken - including the construction of vast new reservoirs.

Marsh Gibbon and Quainton have been proposed as potential sites for the construction of these facilities, each dealing with 30 million cubic metres of water - enough to fill 12,000 Olympic swimming pools.

Yesterday, the majority of nearby parish councillors contacted by The Bucks Herald claimed to know little about the consultations and Bucks County Council have said they will be looking at the plans closely.

Much of the Marsh Gibbon site is believed to be owned by the Berks, Bucks and Oxon Wildlife Trust (BBOWT).

Jackie Phipps, AVDC member for Marsh Gibbon, said: "I thought this reservoir was definitely going to Abingdon. It's very easy to say to people to vote against this, but there are very good reasons why it shouldn't go ahead.

"There are some rare plants throughout the area, which is why BBOWT bought the area and it would be a shame to put it all under water.

"People got grants to drain all the land and of course since then they have had grants to put it back the way it was again because it has these rare plants that were being driven out of the area and it would be a real shame to lose them."

John Cartwright, Bucks CC member for Marsh Gibbon, said: "I think it is unlikely to come about and I think there's a good reason that they will need to go to Abingdon to build a reservoir. In Abingdon the land is much more valuable because it's all gravel, but here it's clay, which will cost them money to get rid of. So I can't see that they would really want to build at Quainton or Marsh Gibbon.

"I've not been involved in the consultation, but all I know is the same as the rumours that everyone else has heard about."

Thames Water have chosen a preferred site at Abingdon for a larger reservoir on grounds of cost, the environment and social impacts, but the two sites in the Vale could still be considered if that falls through.

The reservoir at Marsh Gibbon would cover just over 1,900 acres, whilst the one at Quainton would be 1,828 acres with both sites taking six years to build.

A spokeswoman for Thames Water said: "The Aylesbury area is served by the Slough, Wycombe and Aylesbury Resource Zone, but this area doesn't have a supply/demand imbalance and is expected to have a healthy supply for the planned period.

"The two main things that Aylesbury needs to be concerned with is that we will be enhancing the water efficiency plan and increasing our metering penetration."

The Slough, Wycombe and Aylesbury Resource Zone has a projected surplus of 22 per cent for the next two years, but that is expected to fall to seven per cent as demand grows and uncertainty increases.

As part of their control on water, Thames Water is looking at compulsory metering in 83 per cent of households by 2030 - current levels are 37 per cent.

The spokeswoman added: "Increasing metering will also allow our customers to pay for the water they use, which is a fairer way of charging. We also feel that it is vital that our approach is seen to be consistent across the company when the whole supply area has been designated as seriously water stressed."

If a reservoir was not built at Abingdon, the sites in the Vale would take water from the River Thames downstream of Abingdon when there is plenty of water ready to be released when the river is low, helping with 69 million litres of water supplies for London from each reservoir.

This would mean that if the alternative route was taken there would need to be pipelines and tunnels put in place along with water treatment works and a road or rail connection.

Chris Kenneford, Bucks CC's Strategic Planning Manager, said: "We will be examining this document closely and considering the proposals carefully before responding to this consultation, which is at an early stage at the moment. We would encourage members of the public to take part in Thames Water's consultation exercise and make their views known to Thames Water."

The consultation can be viewed at www.thameswaterconsult.co.uk and responses should be submitted by emailing consultations@thameswater.co.uk or by contacting 0800 107 8001.

What do you think of this story?

To comment on this or any other Bucks Herald story, click here

To post comments directly on this website, click on the Comment on this Story link below

The full article contains 841 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 14 May 2008 3:49 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Aylesbury
 
Prev
1
Next
1

JR,

Aylesbury 14/05/2008 22:46:24
I said it last year, highways are far better at retaining water than Thames Water.
This year I'll go one better. If we really must have many thousands of homes built in this area, why not simply find a suitable field (one in a slight valley), put a lid on it and then build the houses on the giant lid.
Rainwater coming off all those roofs could be piped directly to the field below to create a huge underground reservoir. An added benefit would be the guarantee that the new housing estate would never flood!
Alternatively.
The population of Aylesbury would love to see a bypass built to ease the congestion at peak times, why not dig out a six lane bypass which could double as a flood channel?
During the drier times, this deep channel could serve as a bypass, during the monsoon season, it could take all the excess rainwater & divert it to a nearby reservoir.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Contact us


Quick Links


Bucks Herald multimedia


Local News


Local Sport


Your Opinions


Entertainment


The Big Issues


Big debates from the archive


Most popular archive BHTV videos


BH The Magazine


Nostalgia


Business


Community Newsletters


Towns & villages




Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.